Browse

Journals By Subject

Life Sciences, Agriculture & Food
Chemistry
Medicine & Health
Materials Science
Mathematics & Physics
Electrical & Computer Science
Earth, Energy & Environment
Architecture & Civil Engineering
Education
Economics & Management
Humanities & Social Sciences
Multidisciplinary

Books

Publish Conference Abstract Books
Upcoming Conference Abstract Books
Published Conference Abstract Books
Publish Your Books
Upcoming Books
Published Books

Proceedings

Events

Events
Five Types of Conference Publications

Join

Join as Editor-in-Chief
Join as Senior Editor
Join as Editorial Board Member
Become a Reviewer

Information

For Authors
For Reviewers
For Editors
For Conference Organizers
For Librarians
Article Processing Charges
Special Issue Guidelines
Editorial Process
Manuscript Transfers
Peer Review at SciencePG
Open Access
Copyright and License
Ethical Guidelines
Submit an Article
Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Population-Based Feasibility of AI-Enabled Self-Auscultation using Smartphones: Findings from 109,882 Recordings Across Three Countries

Mark Opauszky,  Nadia Ivanova,  Yaroslav Shpak,  Nataliya Marchenko*
Published in Science Journal of Public Health (Volume 14, Issue 1)
Received: 9 February 2026     Accepted: 20 February 2026     Published: 27 February 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Download PDF
Abstract

Traditional auscultation remains diagnostically valuable but is limited by examiner subjectivity and access. Smartphone-based AI phonoscopy offers an opportunity for scalable self-screening for valvular heart disease. Stethophone®, an AI-enabled software as a medical device, was made available for download in Canada, the United States, and Ukraine. Users recorded heart sounds through the smartphone’s built-in microphones, processed and enhanced in real time using patented audio algorithms. Quality was automatically assessed, and users were prompted to re-record as needed. Recordings were analyzed for murmurs and aortic stenosis signatures using AI phonoscopy. Among 28,188 users producing 109,882 recordings, 91.7% of lay users and 89.0% of healthcare professionals achieved a clinically interpretable recording on the first attempt. Lay-users and healthcare professionals performed similarly (91% vs 89%). The most successful auscultation site was the tricuspid point; the left carotid least. Cardiac murmurs were detected in 16.3% of recordings, corresponding to 15.6% of users. Structural murmurs were identified in 7.0% of users (4.9% of recordings). Murmurs consistent with aortic stenosis were present in 6.3% of users. This study demonstrates that self-auscultation with a smartphone and dedicated medical software is highly feasible in lay populations, with quality results comparable to clinicians. Pathological murmurs, notably those of aortic stenosis, are common and highlight the potential for population-wide early detection of cardiac disorders.

Published in Science Journal of Public Health (Volume 14, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.sjph.20261401.16
Page(s) 53-60
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group
Previous article
Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Self-auscultation, Valvular Heart Disease, Aortic Stenosis, Digital health, Mass Screening

1. Introduction
Structural heart disease remains a leading global health issue. Valvular heart disease (VHD) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality. Moderate to severe VHD affects approximately 2.5% of the general population, increasing to 13.3% in individuals over 75 years
[1]
. While advanced imaging is available in clinical settings, early signs such as murmurs and arrhythmias often go undetected due to a limitation or access to screening tools. Traditional auscultation, though diagnostically rich, has declined in use given its reliance on examiner skill and in-person visits
[2]
. The accuracy of traditional auscultation is variable and often suboptimal. In a subcohort of the OxValve population study, 251 patients without a prior VHD diagnosis underwent cardiac auscultation by two general practitioners, with findings compared to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in an investigator-blinded evaluation. Auscultation demonstrated a sensitivity of only 32% and specificity of 67% for detecting mild VHD, improving to 43% and 69% for significant VHD, respectively
[3]
.
Recent advances in AI phonoscopy and smartphone technology enable high-fidelity cardiac sound capture outside of clinics, potentially transforming early detection. Nevertheless, the question remains whether smartphone-based self-auscultation is practically feasible in real-world conditions, when recordings are performed by large groups of users without clinical supervision. This study set out to test whether self-auscultation with a smartphone and AI phonoscopy can truly work at a population scale. We examined 109,882 recordings collected from users in three countries to evaluate recording quality, first-attempt success, and the practical performance of self-directed auscultation in everyday, non-clinical environments.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Population
This study was designed as a real-world feasibility evaluation of smartphone-based self-auscultation supported by AI-enabled phonoscopy in a large unsupervised population. Stethophone®
[4]
was introduced to the general population in Canada, the United States, and Ukraine through social media-based outreach, primarily viewed by adults over 30 years of age (Figure 1). Approximately 40% of outreach depicted healthy individuals encouraged to self-screen for cardiac anomalies. Another 40% segment depicted older concerned people with nonspecific symptoms (e.g., dyspnea, chest discomfort), seeking information to share with their doctors to receive faster care. The remaining 20% were directed at healthcare professionals offering information about VHD screening and introducing the Stethophone® product as a clinically practical, medically cleared, Class II screening device. Use of the application was voluntary, and no incentives, clinical referrals, or follow-up were provided.
Stethophone® was developed by Sparrow Bioacoustics Inc. (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada) as an AI-enabled software medical device. The system incorporates proprietary AI and bioacoustic enhancement to improve cardiac signal audibility, together with clinical analysis and visualizations to support interpretation. The AI algorithms were developed and trained by Sparrow Bioacoustics on proprietary datasets of chest sound recordings collected at standard auscultation sites. These training datasets cover a broad spectrum of valvular disease presentations but are not publicly available. In line with this implementation context, the study did not aim to assess clinical outcomes, establish disease prevalence, or evaluate diagnostic accuracy, but rather to characterize feasibility and operational performance of self-directed auscultation in a real-world population.
Figure 1. Screenshots of social media materials presenting the Stethophone® application. Screenshots of social media materials presenting the Stethophone® application.
2.2. Data Acquisition and Processing
Users downloaded the Stethophone® software and created accounts, where they self-identified as healthcare workers or lay individuals. After account creation, a short in-app, self-guided tutorial on chest-recording best practices was provided, including guidance on device placement, recognition of clear audio signals, background noise, and software operation. Recordings were then performed by placing the smartphone on the chest, allowing the built-in microphones to capture 20-second chest sounds at standard auscultation sites (Figure 2). All recordings were initiated, repeated, and completed independently, without external assistance, and were performed in non-clinical environments under uncontrolled ambient conditions.
Raw audio signals were enhanced and filtered using Stethophone’s patented audio algorithms to improve signal audibility. An automated quality assessment algorithm evaluated the presence of detectable S1 and S2 heart sounds and evaluated signal integrity relative to background noise. Recordings that did not meet predefined quality thresholds automatically prompted immediate re-recording within the same session.
2.3. AI-based Analysis
Detection of cardiac murmurs was performed using AI phonoscopy. The AI system was used exclusively for automated signal enhancement, quality assessment, and algorithmic classification of recorded cardiac sounds. Algorithmic outputs were generated according to predefined categories, including:
1) 2) 3) All algorithms operated at a pre-specified decision threshold established during prior validation on independent datasets and were not modified, retrained, or adapted using data collected in this study. Outputs were generated automatically and were not adjudicated by clinicians within the context of this study.
2.4. Outcomes and Statistical Analysis
Primary and secondary outcomes were defined a priori and included:
1) successful first-attempt recordings vs multiple attempts or failed attempts,
2) detection of the presence of a cardiac murmur,
3) classification of a found murmur as either innocent or structural,
4) further classification of the murmur as being consistent with aortic stenosis.
The primary outcome of interest was feasibility, operationalized as the proportion of recordings achieving clinically interpretable quality on the first attempt. Secondary outcomes were descriptive and intended to characterize recording performance and signal quality rather than to establish diagnostic accuracy or population prevalence. Outcomes related to recording quality were evaluated at the recording level, whereas outcomes related to murmur detection and classification were evaluated at the participant level, with each participant counted once if at least one positive recording was identified. This participant-level analytical approach was selected to reflect the intended individual-level use of self-auscultation and to avoid artificial inflation of detection rates resulting from repeated recordings by the same user.
Categorical variables are reported as counts and percentages. For key proportions, 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Wilson score method for binomial proportions. Comparisons between groups, including lay users versus healthcare professionals and differences across auscultation sites, were performed using standard statistical tests for proportions, with exact p-values reported where applicable. All statistical tests were two-sided, with a significance threshold of α = 0.05. Given the exploratory and feasibility-focused nature of the study, statistical analyses were primarily descriptive and were not intended to test predefined diagnostic hypotheses. Positive predictive value and recall, reported for murmur detection and murmurs consistent with aortic stenosis, refer to a pre-specified operating point validated on a separate dataset with echocardiographic confirmation. Diagnostic performance metrics were not re-estimated in this unsupervised population study, as confirmatory imaging data were not available. These performance estimates are provided for contextual reference only and should not be interpreted as measures of diagnostic accuracy within the present population.
Recordings that did not meet automated quality thresholds, such as absence of detectable S1 or S2 heart sounds or excessive noise, were treated as failed attempts. Analyses were conducted using all available data. This study employed a convenience sampling approach that included all eligible users during the study period. No a priori sample size or power calculation was performed, as the study was designed to capture real-world operational performance across a broad range of users, devices, and recording conditions rather than to achieve a predetermined statistical power.
3. Results
A total of 28,188 users generated 109,882 cardiac sound recordings during the study period. Recording success on the first and second attempts differed slightly between user groups. Among lay users, 91.7% achieved a high-quality recording on the first attempt and 91.1% on the second attempt, while among healthcare professionals, 89.0% achieved a high-quality recording on the first attempt and 90.9% on the second attempt (Table 1).
Table 1. Recording attempt success for first and second try.

Role

1st Attempt Success

2nd Attempt Success

Lay-Users

91.7%

91.1%

Medical Professionals

89.0%

90.9%
Table 2. Relative percentage of failed recording attempts by auscultation site.

Recording point

Failed recordings (%)

7

Left carotid

16.7%

8

Right carotid

10.9%

1

Erb’s

7.7%

3

Apex

7.2%

4

Pulmonary

5.4%

5

Aortic

5.0%

6

Erb’s right

4.3%

2

Tricuspid

3.4%
Figure 2. Locations of recording points used in the current research.
Recording quality varied across anatomical auscultation sites. The tricuspid auscultation site yielded the highest proportion of successful recordings (96.6%), whereas the left carotid site demonstrated the lowest proportion of successful recordings (83.3%). Site-specific distributions of failed recording attempts are summarized in Table 2, and standard auscultation locations are illustrated in Figure 2.
Algorithmic analysis identified cardiac murmurs in 16.3% of recordings, corresponding to 15.6% of users (95% CI: 15.2-15.9). Among these, 4.9% of recordings — representing 7.0% of users (95% CI: 6.7-7.3) — were classified as structural murmurs. Murmurs consistent with aortic stenosis were identified in 6.3% of users (95% CI: 6.0-6.6).
At the pre-specified operating point validated on a separate echocardiography-confirmed dataset, the model achieved a positive predictive value of 0.93 with a recall of 0.92 for detection of structural murmurs. For moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis, the positive predictive value was 0.89 and recall was 0.91. A detailed breakdown of murmur prevalence and classification across the overall cohort, healthcare professionals, and lay users is provided in Table 3.
Table 3. Overall prevalence of findings.

Parameter

Total

w/Murmur

w/o Murmur

Innocent

Structural

with AS

All subjects

Number of cardiac recordings

109882

17803

91579

12408

5395

4557

Percentage of total recordings

100.0%

16.3%

83.7%

11.3%

4.9%

4.2%

Number of subjects

28188

4388

14616

3533

1979

1786

Percentage of total subjects

100%

15.6%

51.9%

12.5%

7%

6.3%

Medical professionals

Number of cardiac recordings

15003

3010

11993

1777

1233

874

Percentage of total recordings

13.7%

20%

80%

11%

8.2%

5.8%

Number of subjects

2219

497

1376

443

237

199

Percentage of total subjects

7.9%

22.4%

62%

20%

10.7%

9%

Lay users

Number of cardiac recordings

94879

14793

79586

10631

4162

3683

Percentage of total recordings

86.2%

15.7%

84.3%

11.3%

4.4%

3.9%

Number of subjects

26196

3891

13240

3150

1560

1587

Percentage of total subjects

92.9%

14.9%

50.5%

12%

6%

6.1%
4. Discussion
This large real-world study demonstrates that lay individuals without medical training can independently record heart sounds of sufficient quality for automated analysis using a smartphone-based AI auscultation application. Recording success rates among non-medical users were comparable to those achieved by healthcare professionals, indicating that effective auscultation can be performed outside the clinical environment and without direct involvement of specialists. Importantly, users do not require prior clinical or in-person training in auscultation technique: the application provides step-by-step visual prompts directly on the smartphone screen during the recording process, including guidance on device placement, stability of contact, and recording duration, together with automated real-time signal quality control. Recordings are evaluated algorithmically for the presence of discernible heart sounds (S1 and S2) and signal-to-noise characteristics; recordings failing predefined quality criteria, including absence of detectable S1/S2 or excessive non-cardiac noise, trigger immediate re-recording prompts during acquisition, and recordings that do not meet quality criteria after repeated attempts are excluded from further analysis. As a result, adequate recording quality is achieved not through user expertise, but through an embedded digital workflow and algorithmic signal validation, consistent with prior work on automated assessment of clinical acceptability of physiological signals
[5-7]
.
A key implication of these findings is the reduced dependence on specialized medical equipment and on clinical settings traditionally required for cardiac auscultation. Conventional auscultation relies on physical stethoscopes, precise positioning, and interpretive skills, with substantial variability in proficiency even among trained clinicians. Previous studies have shown that accuracy in recognizing standard cardiac sounds among medical students and residents is low, often in the range of 20-30%, highlighting the limitations of auscultation as a skill-dependent method
[1-3, 8, 9]
. Additional work has demonstrated that auscultatory accuracy may decline over time in the absence of continuous reinforcement and objective feedback mechanisms
[8-10]
. In contrast, the smartphone-based approach described here integrates a guided workflow, standardized acoustic processing, and automated signal quality assessment directly into a widely available consumer device, substantially lowering the technical threshold for obtaining reproducible and clinically interpretable heart sound recordings without the need for a separate electronic or acoustic stethoscope
[11, 12]
.
All recordings in this study were performed fully independently, without supervision and outside medical facilities, including at home, at the workplace, and in other everyday environments. Despite potential exposure to ambient noise and variable recording conditions, the vast majority of recordings met predefined quality criteria, indicating that diagnostically usable heart sounds can be obtained without assistance from healthcare professionals. This directly addresses a key limitation of traditional auscultation, which is typically confined to clinical settings and dependent on trained personnel. Decentralization of signal acquisition is increasingly recognized as a prerequisite for scalable screening strategies, particularly in settings with limited access to healthcare infrastructure
[13-15]
. Differences across anatomical recording sites further support these observations: tricuspid and apical positions yielded the highest proportion of successful recordings, whereas carotid recordings were more susceptible to noise and motion artifacts. This pattern is consistent with known acoustic properties of cardiac auscultation and previously reported variability in signal robustness across auscultation sites
[10-12]
.
These findings should also be interpreted in the context of the rapid expansion of telemedicine and digital health. Over the past decade, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has become an integral component of healthcare delivery, with widespread adoption among both patients and clinicians
[13-16]
. Systematic reviews and recent meta-analyses indicate that telemedicine and remote patient monitoring can improve access to care, reduce unnecessary in-person visits, and support earlier detection and management of cardiovascular disease
[17-20, 24-26]
. Cardiology has emerged as one of the fastest-growing domains of telemedicine implementation, especially for screening, follow-up, and asynchronous expert review
[20, 25-28]
. Within this evolving landscape, smartphone-based self-recording of heart sounds represents a natural extension of telemedicine models, enabling individuals to perform recordings in any suitable environment and transmit them for subsequent analysis without requiring an in-person clinical encounter.
Although pathological murmurs, including those consistent with aortic stenosis, were identified in a substantial proportion of users, the aim of this study was not to estimate disease prevalence or to re-establish diagnostic accuracy. Algorithmic decisions were based on predefined thresholds previously validated on independent datasets with echocardiographic confirmation. The modest increase in detected murmurs observed in this unsupervised population likely reflects increased signal variability and the absence of confirmatory imaging, a phenomenon well described when AI-based diagnostic systems transition from controlled validation settings to real-world deployment
[21-23]
.
This study has several limitations. Participation was voluntary and self-selected, and demographic and clinical characteristics were limited to self-reported information, which may introduce selection and reporting biases. The absence of echocardiographic confirmation in this population precludes assessment of diagnostic accuracy or estimation of true disease prevalence. Recordings were performed in unsupervised, real-world environments, introducing variability related to ambient noise and recording conditions. While this variability reflects intended real-world use, it may contribute to an increased rate of false-positive classifications compared with controlled validation datasets, as consistently reported in post-deployment evaluations of AI-based diagnostic systems
[21, 22]
. Finally, the study employed a convenience sampling approach and did not include a priori sample size or power calculations, as it was designed to assess feasibility and operational performance rather than to test diagnostic hypotheses. Accordingly, the findings should be interpreted as evidence of practical feasibility and scalability, rather than as measures of clinical effectiveness.
6. Conclusions
Self-auscultation using smartphones equipped with dedicated AI-enabled software is highly feasible across lay populations and yields clinically interpretable recordings. The substantial proportion of algorithmically identified pathological findings underscores the potential of AI phonoscopy to extend cardiac screening beyond the clinic and to identify individuals who may benefit from further clinical evaluation.
Abbreviations

AI

Artificial Intelligence

AS

Aortic Stenosis

CI

Confidence Interval

PPV

Positive Predictive Value

S1

First Heart Sound

S2

Second Heart Sound

TTE

Transthoracic Echocardiography

VHD

Valvular Heart Disease
Author Contributions
Mark Opauszky: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing – original draft
Nadia Ivanova: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Project administration
Yaroslav Shpak: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology
Nataliya Marchenko: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing
Funding
This work is not supported by any external funding.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the outcome of this research work has been reported in this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Nkomo, V. T., Gardin, J. M., Skelton, T. N., Gottdiener, J. S., Scott, C. G., Enriquez-Sarano, M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. The Lancet. 2006, 368(9540), 1005-1011.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69208-8

[2] Mangione, S. Cardiac auscultatory skills of physicians-in-training: a comparison of three English-speaking countries. The American Journal of Medicine. 2001, 110(3), 210-216.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00673-2

[3] Myerson, S., Prendergast, B., Gardezi, S., et al. GP auscultation for diagnosing valvular heart disease. Heart. 2017, 103(Suppl 3), A101-A102.

https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311726.135

[4] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) Premarket Notification: Stethophone (K231551). Available from:

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPMN/pmn.cfm?ID=K231551 (accessed 9 February 2026).

[5] Shortliffe, E. H., Sepúlveda, M. J. Clinical decision support in the era of artificial intelligence. JAMA. 2018, 320(21), 2199-2200.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.17163

[6] Topol, E. J. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine. 2019, 25(1), 44-56.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7

[7] Clifford, G. D., Behar, J., Li, Q., Rezek, I. Signal quality indices and data fusion for determining clinical acceptability of electrocardiograms. Physiological Measurement. 2012, 33(9), 1419-1433.

https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/33/9/1419

[8] Vukanovic-Criley, J. M., Criley, S., Warde, C. M., et al. Competency in cardiac examination skills in medical students, trainees, physicians, and faculty: a multicenter study. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2006, 166(6), 610-616.

https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.6.610

[9] Finley, J. P., Sharratt, G. P., Nanton, M. A., Chen, R. P., Roy, D. L., Paterson, G. Auscultation of the heart: a trial of classroom teaching versus computer-based independent learning. Medical Education. 1998, 32(4), 357-361.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00210.x

[10] Tavel, M. E. Cardiac auscultation: a glorious past—and it does have a future! Circulation. 2006, 113(9), 1255-1259.

https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.591149

[11] Watrous, R. L. Computer-aided auscultation of the heart: from anatomy and physiology to diagnostic decision support. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 140-143.

https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259757

[12] Constant, J. Bedside Cardiology. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999.
[13] Lucas, J. W., Villarroel, M. A. Telemedicine use among adults: United States, 2021. NCHS Data Brief. 2022, (445), 1-8.

https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:121435

[14] Patel, S. Y., Mehrotra, A., Huskamp, H. A., Uscher-Pines, L., Ganguli, I., Barnett, M. L. Trends in outpatient care delivery and telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2021, 181(3), 388-391.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5928

[15] Keesara, S., Jonas, A., Schulman, K. Covid-19 and health care’s digital revolution. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020, 382(23), e82.

https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2005835

[16] Rabbani, M. G., Alam, A., Prybutok, V. R. Digital health transformation through telemedicine (2020-2025): barriers, facilitators, and clinical outcomes—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Encyclopedia. 2025, 5(4), 206.

https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5040206

[17] Inglis, S. C., Clark, R. A., Dierckx, R., Prieto-Merino, D., Cleland, J. G. Structured telephone support or non-invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015, (10), CD007228.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007228.pub3

[18] Estêvão, M. D., Fernandes, M. T., De Sousa-Coelho, A. L., Espírito-Santo, M., Nascimento, T. Telehealth for integrated cardiovascular and diabetes management: a scoping review. Journal of Diabetes Research. 2025, 2025, 1093671.

https://doi.org/10.1155/jdr/1093671

[19] Liu, J. C., Cheng, C. Y., Cheng, T. H., Liu, C. N., Chen, J. J., Hao, W. R. Unveiling the potential: remote monitoring and telemedicine in shaping the future of heart failure management. Life. 2024, 14(8), 936.

https://doi.org/10.3390/life14080936

[20] Kuan, P. X., Chan, W. K., Fern Ying, D. K., et al. Efficacy of telemedicine for the management of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Digital Health. 2022, 4(9), e676-e691.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00124-8

[21] Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., King, D. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine. 2019, 17(1), 195.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2

[22] Cabitza, F., Rasoini, R., Gensini, G. F. Unintended consequences of machine learning in medicine. JAMA. 2017, 318(6), 517-518.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7797

[23] Liu, X., Faes, L., Kale, A. U., et al. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Digital Health. 2019, 1(6), e271-e297.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30123-2

[24] Steinhubl, S. R., Muse, E. D., Topol, E. J. The emerging field of mobile health. Science Translational Medicine. 2015, 7(283), 283rv3.

https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3487

[25] Bhavnani, S. P., Parakh, K., Atreja, A., et al. 2017 roadmap for innovation—ACC health policy statement on healthcare transformation in the era of digital health, big data, and precision health. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017, 70(21), 2696-2718.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.018

[26] World Health Organization. Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020-2025. Available from:

https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240020924 (accessed 9 February 2026).

[27] Tromp, J., Jindal, D., Redfern, J., et al. World Heart Federation roadmap for digital health in cardiology. Global Heart. 2022, 17(1), 61.

https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1141

[28] Craig, W., Ohlmann, S. The benefits of using active remote patient management for enhanced heart failure outcomes in rural cardiology practice: single-site retrospective cohort study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2024, 26, e49710.

https://doi.org/10.2196/49710

Cite This Article
Plain Text BibTeX RIS

  • APA Style

    Opauszky, M., Ivanova, N., Shpak, Y., Marchenko, N. (2026). Population-Based Feasibility of AI-Enabled Self-Auscultation using Smartphones: Findings from 109,882 Recordings Across Three Countries. Science Journal of Public Health, 14(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20261401.16

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Opauszky, M.; Ivanova, N.; Shpak, Y.; Marchenko, N. Population-Based Feasibility of AI-Enabled Self-Auscultation using Smartphones: Findings from 109,882 Recordings Across Three Countries. Sci. J. Public Health 2026, 14(1), 53-60. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20261401.16

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Opauszky M, Ivanova N, Shpak Y, Marchenko N. Population-Based Feasibility of AI-Enabled Self-Auscultation using Smartphones: Findings from 109,882 Recordings Across Three Countries. Sci J Public Health. 2026;14(1):53-60. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20261401.16

    Copy | Download 

  • @article{10.11648/j.sjph.20261401.16,
  author = {Mark Opauszky and Nadia Ivanova and Yaroslav Shpak and Nataliya Marchenko},
  title = {Population-Based Feasibility of AI-Enabled Self-Auscultation using Smartphones: Findings from 109,882 Recordings Across Three Countries},
  journal = {Science Journal of Public Health},
  volume = {14},
  number = {1},
  pages = {53-60},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjph.20261401.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20261401.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjph.20261401.16},
  abstract = {Traditional auscultation remains diagnostically valuable but is limited by examiner subjectivity and access. Smartphone-based AI phonoscopy offers an opportunity for scalable self-screening for valvular heart disease. Stethophone®, an AI-enabled software as a medical device, was made available for download in Canada, the United States, and Ukraine. Users recorded heart sounds through the smartphone’s built-in microphones, processed and enhanced in real time using patented audio algorithms. Quality was automatically assessed, and users were prompted to re-record as needed. Recordings were analyzed for murmurs and aortic stenosis signatures using AI phonoscopy. Among 28,188 users producing 109,882 recordings, 91.7% of lay users and 89.0% of healthcare professionals achieved a clinically interpretable recording on the first attempt. Lay-users and healthcare professionals performed similarly (91% vs 89%). The most successful auscultation site was the tricuspid point; the left carotid least. Cardiac murmurs were detected in 16.3% of recordings, corresponding to 15.6% of users. Structural murmurs were identified in 7.0% of users (4.9% of recordings). Murmurs consistent with aortic stenosis were present in 6.3% of users. This study demonstrates that self-auscultation with a smartphone and dedicated medical software is highly feasible in lay populations, with quality results comparable to clinicians. Pathological murmurs, notably those of aortic stenosis, are common and highlight the potential for population-wide early detection of cardiac disorders.},
 year = {2026}
}

    Copy | Download 

  • TY  - JOUR
T1  - Population-Based Feasibility of AI-Enabled Self-Auscultation using Smartphones: Findings from 109,882 Recordings Across Three Countries
AU  - Mark Opauszky
AU  - Nadia Ivanova
AU  - Yaroslav Shpak
AU  - Nataliya Marchenko
Y1  - 2026/02/27
PY  - 2026
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20261401.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjph.20261401.16
T2  - Science Journal of Public Health
JF  - Science Journal of Public Health
JO  - Science Journal of Public Health
SP  - 53
EP  - 60
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7950
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20261401.16
AB  - Traditional auscultation remains diagnostically valuable but is limited by examiner subjectivity and access. Smartphone-based AI phonoscopy offers an opportunity for scalable self-screening for valvular heart disease. Stethophone®, an AI-enabled software as a medical device, was made available for download in Canada, the United States, and Ukraine. Users recorded heart sounds through the smartphone’s built-in microphones, processed and enhanced in real time using patented audio algorithms. Quality was automatically assessed, and users were prompted to re-record as needed. Recordings were analyzed for murmurs and aortic stenosis signatures using AI phonoscopy. Among 28,188 users producing 109,882 recordings, 91.7% of lay users and 89.0% of healthcare professionals achieved a clinically interpretable recording on the first attempt. Lay-users and healthcare professionals performed similarly (91% vs 89%). The most successful auscultation site was the tricuspid point; the left carotid least. Cardiac murmurs were detected in 16.3% of recordings, corresponding to 15.6% of users. Structural murmurs were identified in 7.0% of users (4.9% of recordings). Murmurs consistent with aortic stenosis were present in 6.3% of users. This study demonstrates that self-auscultation with a smartphone and dedicated medical software is highly feasible in lay populations, with quality results comparable to clinicians. Pathological murmurs, notably those of aortic stenosis, are common and highlight the potential for population-wide early detection of cardiac disorders.
VL  - 14
IS  - 1
ER  -

    Copy | Download

Author Information
Download PDF
Submit an Article

About Us

Science Publishing Group (SciencePG) is an Open Access publisher, with more than 300 online, peer-reviewed journals covering a wide range of academic disciplines.

Learn More About SciencePG

Products

Information

Important Link

Copyright © 2012 -- 2026 Science Publishing Group – All rights reserved.